ReClaw vs Keep My Claw for OpenClaw disaster recovery.
Both products address OpenClaw recovery. ReClaw is strongest when backup cadence, API automation, restore metadata, and agent-readable discovery matter.
Summary
Keep My Claw focuses on encrypted OpenClaw agent disaster recovery with broad snapshot coverage and agent-readable setup docs. ReClaw focuses on zero-knowledge restore points with a hosted dashboard, scoped API keys, OpenAPI automation, SSE progress, and cadence-based plans.
Comparison
| Need | ReClaw | Keep My Claw |
|---|---|---|
| Rollback window | Plans map directly to daily, 4-hour, or 30-minute cadence. | Snapshot history and storage-focused plan model. |
| Automation surface | CLI, authenticated API, OpenAPI, MCP, and SSE events. | Agent-readable docs and setup path. |
| Operator dashboard | Backup ledger, status, cadence, and restore readiness. | Recovery ledger and setup support positioning. |
| Trust model | Passphrase stays local; server stores ciphertext and metadata. | Client-side encryption with local passphrase handling. |
Choose ReClaw When
- You care about a clear rollback window more than snapshot count.
- You want structured API automation for agents and scripts.
- You need progress streaming while backup work is in flight.
- You want pricing to scale with backup frequency.
Choose Keep My Claw When
- You want one subscription shape around many agents.
- You prioritize bundled setup assistance and snapshot history.
- You do not need the ReClaw OpenAPI, MCP, or SSE integration surfaces.
Next
The fastest way to evaluate ReClaw is to run the restore drill and confirm a verified archive exists before you need it.